Home » Uncategorized » Glen Gibellina on the Florida Bar

Glen Gibellina on the Florida Bar


Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
John Adams,

Owners Name & Address 

TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-2300

(1) The Florida Bar’s membership is over 93,000.
(2) There are 22 sections to the Florida Bar.
(3) Of those 22 sections, the Family Law Section contains only 3,500 members.
(4) Unlicensed Practice of Law is not a violation of the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Codes, the Florida Constitution or the Florida Statutes.
(5) The Unlicensed Practice of Law is a violation of the Florida Bar, of which you have to first be a member of the Florida Bar.
(6) The penalty of Unlicensed Practice of Law can be found here (Rule 10-7.2 (f)) http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/CAFC2DA45579F52D85257919006FCCCB
Therefore it is a union violation, only enforceable on union (lawyer) members.
(7) The American Bar Associations, and its 50 illegal subsidiaries were founded 75 years after the U.S. Constitution was ratified.

(8) Since that time, no amendment was made to any constitution to define or acknowledge the existence or validity of a legal bar, contempt of court, client attorney privilege or unlicensed practice of law.
(9) The slightest mention of lawyer in the Bill of Rights is the 6th Amendment, claiming that a person(that could be me) has a right to counsel(that could be you).
(10) A person’s right to practice law and argue before the court for themselves or anyone else, is the 1st Amendment.
Why won’t this work? Because the guys and gals in the courtroom with badges and guns haven’t read the Constitution and don’t know that they work for the Executive Branch, not the Judicial Branch.

We need to teach them about their sworn oath of office and that they need to protect the people, not the lawyers and judges.

COLOR OF LAW; The act of a state officer, regardless of whether or not the act is within the limits of his or her authority, is considered an act under color of law if the officer purports to be conducting himself or herself in the course of official duties.

Glen Gibellina

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: